Description:

  • Emperical science
  • Derived from Greek, meaning experience
  • Knowledge is gained through experience
  • Objects of Interest have different characteristics/features

Research Method:

Scientific hypotheses:
  • A good hypothesis
    • relates to real, measurable things
    • generalizes beyonds observations: cant gather every population there are
    • can be expressed as conditional statements
      • ”there are some” cant be expressed
    • can be falsified
      • if “can lead to”: think of infinite line of samples, there is no amount of samples to be able to falsify the statement
  • Generally, a hypotheses are not falsifiable
    • existential clause
    • ”can” statement
    • poorly defined constructs
    • tautologies
    • metaphysical statements
  • bad examples:??
    • selection bias
Constructs
  • Operationalization: how do we translate a feature into variable value?
  • Latent vs manifest features:
    • latent features doesnt exist physically in reality “hypothetical constructs”: creativity, frustration,..
    • manifest features: distance, count,…
  • Most things we measure are latent features in psychology
Terminology:
  • IV vs DV
    • Independent variable (IV): cause of sth
    • Dependent variable (DV): Effect of sth
  • Moderator variable: moderates relationship between IV and DC
    • interaction variable
    • something that acts upon the relationship between two variables and changes its direction or strength
    • an intermediate variables: IV affects moderator affect DV
    • example:
      • “The more people witness an emergency situation, the less likely any single person is to intervene” (Bystander effect)
      • It depends on how dangerous the situation is.
      • Dangerous situations attenuate the bystander effect
  • Mediator variable mediates relationship between IV and DV
    • part of the causal pathway of an effect, and it tells you how or why an effect takes place
    • If something is a mediator:
      1. It’s caused by the independent variable.
      2. It influences the dependent variable
      3. When it’s taken into account, the statistical correlation between the independent and dependent variables is higher than when it isn’t considered.
    • example:
      • Bystander effect
      • Perception of emergency and experienced arousal increase the probability to intervene
      • More nb of passive bystanders reduce perception of emergency
      • Perception of emergency increases probability to intervene
  • Mediator and moderator|500
  • Causality can be established by randomly assigned participants to different levels of the IV
    • samples dont choose which class/group they get to be in
Theory-driven approach:
  • Theory provide general explainations for human behavior
    • /= hypothesis
  • Scientific theories satisfy 3 requirements:
    • Statements about constructs: abstract concepts such as “self-esteem”, “intelligence” or “happiness”
    • Describe causal relationships: cause-effect coupling
      • allows designing interventions to fix the causal-effect (with other hypotheses /predictions)
    • General scope: need to apply across a variety of different settings
How reliable is research?
  • Construct validity: Am i measuring the right construct?
    • makes sure that events that occur in research setting actually correspond to the theoretical construct
    • The extent to which the independent and dependent variables used in research correspond to the theoretical constructs under investigation
    • IVs and DVs must correspond to the intended constructs, and they must not correspond to other constructs
    • There are infinitely many ways to measure psychological constructs
    • How to measure psychological constructs:
      • self-report measures: rate on a scale
      • observational measure: record actions
      • archival measures: see past trends
      • performance measure: test scores/speed/…
      • physiological measure: brain activity
  • Internal validity: can i draw the correct conclusions about causality?
    • extent to which it can be concluded that changes in the independent variable actually caused changes (not any other cause) in the dependent variable in a research study
    • dependent on the research design
    • Gold standard of establishing causality is an experimental design:
      • A research design in which researchers randomly assign participants to different groups and manipulate one or more independent variables.
    • Random assignment: The procedure of assigning participants to different experimental groups so that every participant has exactly the same chance as every other participant of being in any given group.
    • Manipulation: Intentionally varying some factor as the independent variable in an experimental research design
  • External validity: makes sure that we can make claims about more than just the people in a study (generalize)
    • extent to which research results can be generalized to other appropriate people, times, and settings

Biological psychology:

The human nervous system
  • Includes:
    • peripheral nervous system (PNS)
      • somatic nervous system: control what brain ask of the body
        • cranial nerves: Emerge directly from the brain
        • spinal nerves: Emerge from the segments of the spinal cord.
      • autonomic nervous system
        • parasympathetic nervous system: The “rest-and-digest” system, conserving energy and promoting routine body maintenance
        • sympathetic nervous system: The “fight-or-flight” system, preparing the body for intense physical activity or perceived danger.
    • central nervous system (CNS):
Stress
  • Three dimensions of stress:
    • Psychological stress
    • Sympathetic nervous system reaction to stress
    • Hormonal reaction to stress
Psychological stress response
  • Psychological stress = perceived stress
  • appraisal theory:
    • Our emotional and physiological response to an event is not determined by the event itself, but by our interpretation or appraisal of it
    • Stress is a transaction between an individual and their environment
    • Step 1: Primary Appraisal: interpretation of the stressors if dangerous step 2
      • Initial evaluation
      • “Am I in trouble?”
      • Three possible outcomes:
        • Irrelevant
        • Benign–positive
        • Stressful
      • Three stressful appraisal forms:
        • Harm/loss (damage already sustained)
        • Threat (anticipated harm/loss)
        • Challenge (possibility for mastery or gain)
    • Step 2: Secondary Appraisal: analysis of the available resources
      • “What might and can I do?” if efficient cause stress
      • Different coping options are evaluated:
        • Will it accomplish what it is supposed to do?
        • Can I apply a particular strategy effectively?
        • What are the consequences of using that strategy?
    • Step3: Reappraisal: pacing and learning
      • “How has the situation changed?”
      • Usually based on new information or as a result of cognitive coping efforts
  • Sympathetic nervous system reaction to stress
    • Increase quickly and dropping quickly right after
  • Neurons and neural activity:
    • Neurons communicate using electrical signals (action potentials)
    • Action potentials form the basis of all neuronal communication
    • At the macro level, the firing rate reflects transmission of information
    • Even during sleep, there is only a small, ~15%, decrease in energy use
    • Energy to the brain is supplied as oxygen and glucose (sugar)
    • How to measure neural activity? with subtraction method
      • Most common use of fMRI is to apply the subtraction method to identify brain areas related to certain cognitive functions
      • Example use:
        • Why do people remember some words but not others?
        • Participants learned lists of words
        • Needed to make recognition decisions
        • Measure activity for remembered vs. forgotten words
      • subtraction method: minus the 2 scans to identify the differences
    • Connectivity analysis
      • Measurement of neural activity asks which areas are active when engaging with a specific task
      • Connectivity analysis asks which areas influence the activity of other areas

Cognitive bias